Why Western Politics is Failing

The Wealth Gap and the Absence of Real Representation

When people talk about the crises facing Western politics such as corruption, low voter turnout, polarisation, they often overlook the deeper issue; most of the decision-making is done by people with little or no contemporary experience of the lives they are shaping.

In other words, the politicians writing laws about healthcare are often insulated from the NHS waiting lists. Those setting housing policy are usually landlords themselves. The people declaring that “austerity is necessary” rarely have to choose between heating and eating.

This isn’t just about ideology, it’s about lived experience. Politics in the UK, the US, and much of Europe has become dominated by a political class that is wealthier, whiter, older, and more privileged than the populations they represent. That privilege creates space for right-wing ideologies to take root and corrupt the society we’re living in.

The Wealth Gap Between Politicians and the Public

The numbers speak for themselves. MPs in the UK earn a basic salary of £93,904 per year, over double the national median. Many hold additional income streams from property ownership, consultancy work, or family wealth. In the US, members of Congress are millionaires on average, compared to a median household income of around $80,610.

This wealth gap matters because it creates blind spots. It’s difficult for a politician who has never had to live on Universal Credit, or face eviction, or choose between paying for prescriptions and groceries, to fully understand the realities of austerity or benefit cuts.

Policies are made from above, by people looking down. And that skewed perspective is why so many decisions feel disconnected or even hostile to the general public. We feel as though we are ants in an antidote farm rather than humans in a civilised society.

The Barriers to Marginalised People Entering Politics

It’s not that marginalised people don’t want to participate in politics, it’s that the system is built to keep them out. Campaigning requires money, networks, and time, all of which are harder to access if you are working class, disabled, or from a racialised or LGBTQIA+ community.

For neurodivergent people, the barriers multiply. Campaigning often means sensory-intensive environments, unrelenting schedules, constant public scrutiny, neurotypical performance; all of which can be disabling in itself. Even when neurodivergent individuals do make it into political spaces, they face ableism, and normativity that frames their existence as a problem rather than a leader. The double empathy problem, the empathy divide between different cultural experiences, becomes a weapon through which marginalised folks are excluded from office rather than included.

But this is not just about neurodivergence. It’s about a system that routinely excludes anyone who doesn’t fit the mould of the privileged, educated, able-bodied, middle-class politician.

Why This Matters for Democracy

A democracy that only represents the already powerful is not a democracy, it’s an oligarchy in all but name. If politics continues to be dominated by those with wealth and privilege, it will continue to produce policies that protect wealth and privilege.

This is why political alienation is growing. People feel that politicians “don’t get it”, because in truth, they don’t. And when people no longer feel represented, trust in democratic institutions collapses.

The truth is that fixing this requires more than just asking for “better politicians”. It requires structural change to how representation works in Western politics.